3/5/26: Newsom Calls Israel Apartheid, Saagar Humiliated On War, Lindsey Graham Holy War - Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar Recap

Podcast: Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar

Published: 2026-03-05

Duration: 1 hr 2 min

Summary

In this episode, Krystal and Saagar discuss Gavin Newsom's evolving stance on Israel, specifically his acknowledgment of the apartheid label, and the implications for U.S. military support. They also touch on the internal conflicts within the Democratic Party regarding foreign policy as the 2028 election approaches.

What Happened

The episode opens with Krystal and Saagar expressing excitement about the role independent media has played in recent elections, emphasizing their unique perspective. They then shift focus to the Democratic Party's struggle to navigate the complex issue of U.S. support for Israel, particularly under the leadership of Gavin Newsom, who is attempting to align with a Democratic base increasingly critical of the Israeli government's actions in Gaza.

Newsom's recent comments on the Israel-Palestine situation have raised eyebrows, as he seems to be distancing himself from his previous unwavering support for Israel. He described the current Israeli leadership, particularly Netanyahu, as leading the country down a troubling path, suggesting that this could necessitate a re-evaluation of U.S. military aid. Krystal and Saagar highlight the significance of Newsom labeling Israel an apartheid state, noting that such rhetoric would have been unthinkable just a few years ago, indicating a shift in the political landscape and Democratic Party dynamics.

Key Insights

Key Questions Answered

What did Gavin Newsom say about Israel's leadership?

Gavin Newsom expressed that the current leadership in Israel is leading the country down a problematic path, implying that this situation might force the U.S. to reconsider its military support. He noted that many Democrats have been uncomfortable with Netanyahu's regime and suggested that the trajectory of Israel's actions calls into question America's relationship with the country.

How has public sentiment shifted regarding U.S. support for Israel?

Krystal and Saagar pointed out that the Democratic base is increasingly disillusioned with the U.S.'s complicity in the situation in Gaza. They highlighted that many Democrats are now openly questioning the appropriateness of unconditional military support for Israel, reflecting a broader movement within the party to reassess longstanding foreign policy positions.

What impact does Newsom's position have on the Democratic Party?

Newsom's shifting rhetoric illustrates the internal conflicts within the Democratic Party as it seeks to reconcile traditional support for Israel with the growing demands from its base for accountability and a more nuanced approach. His comments about Israel being labeled an apartheid state signify a potential opening for new political discourse within the party.

How do Krystal and Saagar view the future of U.S.-Israel relations?

They suggest that the future could see a recalibration of U.S.-Israel relations, especially if centrist Democrats begin to adopt a more realist perspective on the conflict. The hosts believe that the conversation might pivot towards ensuring Israel behaves in a way that does not lead to further regional instability, rather than providing unqualified support.

What role does independent media play in shaping these discussions?

Krystal and Saagar emphasize the crucial role independent media has played in influencing public discourse and political narratives, particularly regarding contentious issues like foreign policy. They argue that by providing honest perspectives, independent outlets can shape voter sentiments and pressure politicians to reconsider their positions on critical issues.