A look at Trump's plans to restrict voting - Fresh Air Recap

Podcast: Fresh Air

Published: 2026-03-03

Duration: 44 min

Summary

In this episode, Terry Gross discusses President Trump's proposed SAVE Act and the potential chaos it could unleash on the voting process. Election law expert Rick Hassen highlights the implications of these proposals and the conspiracy theories fueling them.

What Happened

As the election season heats up with primaries in Texas, North Carolina, and Arkansas, President Trump is urging Congress to endorse the SAVE Act, which would significantly alter voter registration and voting procedures across the nation. According to predictions, this legislation could prevent millions of citizens from meeting new ID requirements, leading to disorder at polling places and complicating the election oversight process. With Congress appearing resistant to passing this act, Trump is considering an executive order to implement these changes unilaterally.

Rick Hassen, an expert in election law, elaborates on the conspiracy theories that underpin Trump's actions, particularly allegations of foreign interference in previous elections. He points out that while there were attempts to influence public opinion during the 2016 and 2020 elections, there has been no credible evidence of actual interference with voting systems. Hassen explains that the proposed executive order, drafted by election deniers, seeks to grant the president extensive authority over elections, including stringent requirements for voter registration and identification that could disenfranchise many voters.

Furthermore, Hassen outlines the impracticality of implementing these changes by the 2026 elections, as they would require extensive documentation from voters to prove citizenship. This could create significant hurdles for long-time voters who would need to re-register. The proposed measures also raise constitutional questions since the Constitution gives states the authority to manage their election processes, indicating potential legal battles ahead if such an executive order were to be enacted.

Key Insights

Key Questions Answered

What is the SAVE Act proposed by Trump?

The SAVE Act is legislation that President Trump is pushing Congress to pass, which would significantly change how American citizens register to vote and how they vote. The proposed act includes strict ID requirements that many citizens may not be able to fulfill, leading to predictions of mass disenfranchisement at polling places. If passed, it could create chaos in the electoral process.

How might Trump's executive order affect voting rights?

If Congress does not pass the SAVE Act, President Trump has threatened to issue an executive order that would implement the same changes. This order could impose various restrictions on voter registration and voting processes, effectively federalizing elections and making it more difficult for citizens to register and vote. Hassen warns that this could significantly alter the landscape of voting in the U.S.

What conspiracy theories are influencing Trump's voting proposals?

The conversation reveals a range of conspiracy theories suggesting that foreign entities, like China and Iran, interfered in the 2020 elections. Hassen notes that while there were attempts at influence, there is no evidence of actual tampering with voting processes. However, these theories appear to be leveraged by Trump supporters to justify the need for drastic changes in voting laws.

What are the challenges of the proposed voter registration changes?

The proposed changes would require Americans to provide documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote, which could include a passport or birth certificate. Hassen points out that obtaining these documents often involves bureaucratic hurdles, such as contacting government offices and potentially incurring costs. This would likely discourage many eligible voters from participating in elections.

What constitutional issues arise from Trump's voting proposals?

The Constitution grants states the authority to determine the time, place, and manner of elections, which could complicate Trump's ability to enforce his proposed changes through an executive order. Hassen highlights that while Congress can pass laws to override state rules, any federal takeover of election processes would face significant legal challenges, raising questions about the constitutionality of such actions.